MESOPOTAMIA NEWS : WHAT NOW FOR ISRAEL ? – As Biden enters White House, did Israel’s Mossad win war with Iran?

INTELLIGENCE AFFAIRS: As Biden prepares to take office, Israel is in a better place in efforts to prevent Iran’s nuclear program.


Given that the incoming Biden administration continues to forecast a readiness to return to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal without necessarily addressing all of Israel’s objections, did Mossad director Yossi Cohen succeed at his own goal of stopping Iran’s nuclear program?

weiterlesen / click to continue

MESOPOTAMIA NEWS “ON IRANIAN DEMAND!” : More than half of American forces will have withdrawn from Iraq in ‘coming days’: PM Kadhimi

07-01-2021 Khazan Jangiz – ERBIL, Kurdistan Region — Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi confirmed on Tuesday that “more than half” of American forces in Iraq will have withdrawn within the “coming days”, during a televised speech for the occasion of the Iraqi Army’s 100th anniversary.

weiterlesen / click to continue


The YBŞ International: Interview

by Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi  • 

The YBŞ (the Kurdish abbreviation for the ‘Sinjar Resistance Units‘) first emerged in 2014 as a defence force for the Yezidi people in the Sinjar area when they were subject to attempted genocide at the hands of the Islamic State. The YBŞ still maintains a presence in the Sinjar area. While it has recruited many Iraqi Yezidis into its ranks, the YBŞ also has a wing of foreign volunteers from various countries outside the immediate region. This wing is called the YBŞ International. To learn more about the the YBŞ International and its history, I conducted an interview with the YBŞ International’s spokesman. Any parenthetical insertions in square brackets are my own. The most notable aspect of this interview in my view is the issue of the YBŞ links with the Syrian Democratic Forces and its operations inside Syria. This is undoubtedly on account of the connection with the YPG component of the Syrian Democratic Forces.

1. When was the YBŞ International formed? Where was it formed and what were the reasons for its formation? What are its origins and from which countries have its members come?

Many foreigners joined the Kurdish militia in Rojava [Syrian Kurdistan] to fight against the Islamic State since 2014. Some of those foreigner fighters went to Shingal [Sinjar] to fight in Shingal as well against ISIS. Many of them left and some of them stayed in Shingal and formed an international unit with foreigners from all around the world. Germans, Spaniards, Americans and also Australians were part of the YBŞ International unit.

2. In which battles has the YBŞ International participated and what is the number of its martyrs?

The YBŞ International have been part of the most important battles in the last 4 years in Rojava and in Shingal. One of the first operations was in Raqqa, where the YBŞ International were together with a Yezidi unit from Shingal in the first position at the frontline. The unit was leaded by Serdest Shingal, who was murdered by a Turkish Airstrike on the 15th of January 2020.

The YBŞ International was also deployed to Afrin when Turkey started the invasion in 2018. During the Turkish attacks and bombing one member of the YBŞ unit lost his life (Sheid Baran Galicia) and another member got heavily injured.

YBŞ International was also sent to fight against the last ISIS zones in east Syria (Deir az-Zor) in 2018, where Ramon Rull (Sheid Kendal Rull) lost his life.

The unit took also part of fighting ISIS cells in the mountains of Sinjar in 2019.

In the last Turkish invasion in Rojava in 2020 [sic: 2019], the YBŞ International unit was sent to Rojava to fight against the Turkish mercenaries. Konstantin G. lost his life while another YBŞ International member was heavily injured,

3. What are the current roles that YBŞ International plays considering that Shingal was liberated some time ago?

The role of the YBS International in Shingal is to protect the Sinjar Region. The unit trains every day, helps the locals (Kurds, Yezidis, Arabs) in any way and is prepared for everything that may come.

4. What do you think of the current situation in Shingal? What is your view of the agreement between Baghdad and Arbil regarding Shingal? Considering that you are a team of foreigners with the YBŞ and the Kurdistan Regional Government invokes the presence of foreigners as a reason to remove the YBŞ and Asayish Izidkhan [internal police unit linked to the YBŞ] from the area, would you not say it is better to dissolve YBŞ International?

The reason is not us foreigners, the reason is because the YBŞ is independent. Neither Iraq nor the KRG have any influence on the YBŞ. The YBS has successfully built up a self-administered Shingal over the years, which Erdogan does not like of course. He is behind it [i.e. the pressure to remove the YBŞ from Sinjar area] to provoke a war between Kurds.

The PDK [Kurdistan Democratic Party: Mas’oud Barzani’s party] Peshmerga want to come to Shingal again after they left the population alone in 2014 and are therefore responsible for the genocide we all know. The YBŞ will not let this happen. The YBŞ will not betray the Yezidis as the PDK Peshmerga did or the Iraqi Army.

The situation in Shingal now is that the YBŞ have withdrawn from the cities except for the Asayish (police forces of the YBŞ) [i.e. the Asayish Izidkhan]. But this is all happening with the agreement of the commanders of the YBŞ and the Iraqi Army.


Intel: Biden to pick Brett McGurk for top White House Middle East role

Picking the former defeat-ISIS envoy to oversee US Middle East policy sends a strong signal to Turkey.

US Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) (L) walks with Brett McGurk (R), former special presidential envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL, at the US Capitol, Oct. 23, 2019, in Washington, DC. McGurk was appointed to the position by President Barack Obama in 2015.

Jan 6, 2021  – President-elect Joe Biden is expected to choose Brett McGurk, the former envoy to the US-led international coalition to defeat the Islamic State (IS), for the lead role in the White House overseeing US policy in the Middle East and North Africa.

weiterlesen / click to continue

MESOPOTAMIA NEWS Research ArticleThe Limits of Ideologically-Unlikely Partnerships: Syria’s Support for Jihadi Terrorist Groups

Barak Mendelsohn – Received 10 Jun 2020, Accepted 12 Dec 2020, Published online: 04 Jan 2021


Why did Syria collaborate with al-Qaeda’s Iraqi branch after 2003 and with ISIS during the Syrian civil war? States’ support for terrorist groups is risky, but cooperation with jihadi actors who see the Syrian regime as an enemy and wish to impose a radical Islamic rule in its stead is particularly dangerous. This paper argues that such ideologically-unlikely partnerships reveal the workings of the instrumental logic behind state-sponsored terrorism. Collaborating with terrorist groups is a rational strategy. States such as Syria will partner with ideologically-incompatible terrorist groups when they judge there to be a greater and more urgent threat from a third actor; when they believe the partnership would give them unique capabilities or produce special, otherwise unattainable effects; and when they believe they can shield themselves from the relationship’s potential adverse effects. The Syrian case also shows that such a pairing is likely to have limited utility. In order to have meaningful impact, the terrorist group must have a significant role, but the greater this role is, the higher the direct danger the group poses to its ally and the greater the likelihood of international action against the sponsoring state.

weiterlesen / click to continue


Afghans expel 10 Chinese spies who allegedly made contact with pro-Taliban group


The Afghan government reportedly expelled from the country 10 Chinese intelligence officers on Saturday, after they were found to have contacts with pro-Taliban groups. Meanwhile the White House was recently briefed about claims that Beijing offered Afghan militants bounties for killing American soldiers.

weiterlesen / click to continue

MESOPOTAMIA NEWS “DOWNGOING KURDISTAN IRAQ”: KRG cuts over 10,000 illegal salaries amid ongoing reform process: finance ministry

Halgurd Sherwani  January 4 2021   16:40 – The KRG Finance Ministry order that cuts over 10,000 illegal public payments.

(Kurdistan 24) – The Kurdistan Region’s finance ministry on Monday announced that it had cut over 10,000 illegal salaries as part of the government’s reform package regarding the payment of salaries, allowances, and pensions.

The order from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) Ministry of Finance came after the government’s biometric system detected that 10,609 salaries were being paid illegally.

weiterlesen / click to continue


Al-Assad’s pre-election measures: Application and goals

Enab Baladi-Noureddin Ramadan  4 an 2021 – The head of the Syrian regime, Bashar al-Assad, has taken several measures ahead of the 2021 presidential elections. With these measures, al-Assad seeks to consolidate his rule, particularly if elections are to be held under international controls.

In the past weeks, Syrian regime officials, chiefly the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Faisal Mekdad, and al-Assad’s advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, stated that elections will be conducted on time, namely between April 16 and May 16, 2021, in line with the election law.

weiterlesen / click to continue


The Hashd in Sinjar: Interview

by Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi  • 

Continuing in the series of interviews that cover the present situation in the Sinjar area in northwestern Iraq, I turn now to this interesting interview with al-Sayyid Mahmoud Ridha al-Araji that was broadcast on the channel al-Fallujah TV last month as part of the channel’s documentary on Sinjar. Araji, who is described in the documentary as ‘commander of the Hashd forces in Sinjar,’ is more specifically the commander of a Hashd Sha’abi Commission formation in the Sinjar area: namely, the ‘Sinjar Force,’ which uses imagery that is similar to that of the al-Abbas shrine Hashd group called the al-Abbas Combat Division, as can be seen in comparing the Sinjar Force’s image below with that of the al-Abbas Combat Division.

Indeed, it should be noted that Araji has relations with the al-Abbas shrine and the al-Abbas Combat Division.

In the interview, Araji discusses the general situation, the issue of whether the de jure mayor of Sinjar- Mahama Khalil (who is based in Duhok and tied to the Kurdistan Democratic Party that withdrew from Sinjar in 2017)- can return, the Hashd’s role in the area and relations with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), and the issue of the return of IDPs. Araji insists that the security situation is good but does admit that there are ‘political’ problems, though he claims that the Hashd is a military institution and is not involved with political disputes.

For me, the most notable part of the interview is Araji’s response to the question as to whether the Hashd works with the PKK. His answer is that he works with Iraqis and he notes an Iraqi Yezidi force called the ‘al-Nasr al-Mubin Regiment’ (‘The Clear Victory Regiment’) that is part of the Hashd and receives salaries from the Iraqi government. This is an important point confirming that at least part of the PKK-affiliated ‘Sinjar Resistance Units’ (YBS) is operating under the cover of the Hashd. Indeed, it is notable in this context that in early November 2020, the YBS’ main social media page featured a statement from the ‘al-Nasr al-Mubin Force (the First Regiment).’

A purported Hashd administrative document from Ninawa dating to November 2020 has also emerged, showing an order to change the name of the ‘al-Nasr al-Mubin Regiment’ to ‘Regiment 80.’ This would be similar to other ‘tribal Hashd’ and minority group regiments in Ninawa that operate by regiment numbers). In early December 2020, a report claimed that a committee was formed to ‘track checkpoints and bases empty of armed persons,’ formed by order of the Iraqi army’s West Ninawa operations command, with removal of ‘armed personnel’ from Sinjar district and closure of all unofficial party bases, supervised by the Iraqi army’s 72nd brigade head, the National Security director, the intelligence apparatus, the police directorate and attended by the Hashd Sha’abi’s apparatus of ‘Regiment 80’ (i.e. the part of the YBS operating under the Hashd).

Below is my rough translation transcript of the al-Fallujah TV interview with Araji. The original can be viewed here. Note that interruptions and the nature of the interview mean some thoughts and sentences might not be completed. Any suggestions for amendments are welcome.


al-Sayyid Mahmoud al-Araji

[Channel’s introduction]: The Hashd Sha’abi forces that are on ribat on the peripheries of the town of Sinjar are one of the armed sides that were a party in the contracting of the Sinjar agreement that has not seen light until now. Some accuse some of those factions of impeding that agreement in addition to their support for the personality of the mayor present in the town, as well as their tension with the Peshmerga forces.

Q: Sayyid, tell us about your assessment of the security situation in the beginning for Sinjar currently.

A: In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful, the situation regarding the security angle, we do not have any security problem: that is a real security problem. The security situation is very good in Sinjar. The security is stable, and you have seen the town. Since 2017 we have been present in the town. There have been no notable or big incidents. Regarding the problems that have come in the area, as you know the area came out of the control of Da’esh which harmed this society, in particular the Yezidi brothers. These social bonds of the society, when they become deficient, and you have a mixed community, in which there are Muslims, Yezidis, Christians, and from the Arab and Turkmen ethnicities: of course the result. The situation is good in terms of what is present in the area.

Q: From the administrative angle and the angle that concerns cooperation, today there is a problem as there are two people as mayor in administering Sinjar. With whom do you work? Whom do you recognise frankly?

A: Look, in Sinjar, we as a military institution are connected with the general commander for the armed forces. Our assignments are far removed from issues of services but rather connected with security issues. The legal and official mayor is Mr. Mahama Khalil, and after 2017 he is a man who left the area: we do not know the reasons. As a result he is outside Sinjar district.

Q: He is afraid perhaps of you, Sayyid. Is there danger to him frankly?

A: In fact Mr. Mahama Khalil, I do not expect. Look, considering he is a person of the state…

Q: But he is from a party opposed to you.

A: We are not concerned with quote-unquote parties.

Q: But there was a security force present in Sinjar. After your entry, this force withdrew: that is, the Peshmerga. Is this not a danger for him?

A: We are not coming as parties. We are not parties.

Q: No, a security force.

A: A security force.

Q: In exchange for the Peshmerga that was the security force in control of Sinjar.

A: Allow me to speak frankly. With regards to the issue of security activity, when an order comes from the general commander of the armed forces and from the Joint Operations, it is a military order. So the movements to any place are in accordance with the orders issued. After the events of Kirkuk, after what happened, the orders came that there should be the entry. Originally the security forces were present on the peripheries of Sinjar, south of Sinjar. The orders came to enter the district of Sinjar. The Kurdish forces, the Peshmerga forces, withdrew, and they are also a part of the Iraqi security system.

Q: This is the problem.

A: Which are part of the Iraqi security system. They withdrew: not present currently. We entered the area. I have nothing to do with parties, nor do I have involvement with any political activity such that you can put me in what is between the parties.

Q: Okay, so there is no danger to Mahama Khalil, the mayor?

A: I do not expect so: in what way would there be danger to him?

Q: In that he is of a party that is not in control of Sinjar. And the problem you sir spoke of it: in that the Peshmerga are forces affiliated with the Ministry of Defence, while the Hashd Sha’abi Commission is affiliated with the Prime Minister’s office. So the problem is there is a conflict of two security forces recognised by the state.

A: Look, there are two points of view. If we look from the view of the distancing of the security institution from the political disputes and conflicts, there is a specific interpretation. But if you take the political dimensions and confuse them with the security institution, there will be another interpretation that you get. With regards to Mahama Khalil, he is a man who left the region: until now, I have not seen some real problem, because the people present: who were the people present? The Yezidis, in fact. And we are the sons of Sinjar. There are no concerns. As a basic point: we in Sinjar do not have societal problems. There is no problem.

Q: But there are security and party problems.

A: Security problems, there are none.

Q: Party problems.

A: Politics influences the aspect of…

Q: Tension.

A: Tension, perhaps.

Q: Now Sinjar is tense. Not societal tension, but political.

A: Political tension.

Q: Right? Sayyid, let us speak about the Kurdistan Workers Party. The party is present in- I don’t know which mountain- but I mean in the peripheries of Sinjar perhaps. Is this a danger to the people of Sinjar?

A: With regards to the Kurdistan Workers Party, or any force…

Q: As armed factions for this party…

A: I speak to you regarding the armed factions. Look, in 2014, when there happened what happened in this area, behind this mountain, and the absence of the state under all its names, in that time, Da’esh: were it not for the humanitarian stances that these armed Kurdish groups took, I do not get involved in the Syrian matters: but since they were near to us in place, that is, Hasakah province in Syria. After the attack on this area by the takfiri Da’esh organisation, there was a humanitarian stance.

Q: From the Workers Party.

A: From these Kurdish forces, whether the Workers Party or others. A humanitarian stance. They came to this area. The statistic is to be noted: 70,000 IDPs managed to get on a secure path throughout the mountain towards Syria. And they got rid of…

Q: This stance was expected among you?

A: This stance, we at the time, nor before did we expect it. In truth. This stance was not expected.

Q: But let us know currently, do they work with you?

A: I work with Iraqis, and I have never worked…

Q: But currently within your Iraqi borders, on your Iraqi side.

A: Those who are present on the ground: Iraqi, son of the region, Yezidi, we know them as neighbours. As the result of what is present, the Iraqis present, they are actually Hashd Sha’abi, so the picture can be clear. Those forces- or the al-Nasr al-Mubin regiment- by decision of the Iraqi government, are being paid salaries. I have come to work with Iraqis. As for those behind them…

Q: There is a Turkish pretext, now, about the Kurdistan Workers Party. The Turkish pretext is that the presence of these personnel, because of their presence, there has been bombing on Sinjar. Today, why have you as the Hashd Sha’abi not worked to remove these personnel on account of whom there has been bombing of Sinjar?

A: Look, we as Hashd Sha’abi, our assignments are clear.

Q: A decision not security, but political?

A: Our assignments are clear, our competencies and our aims are clear. It is not possible for us to take decisions or matters on our own because we embody the state in everything we do. The state has its ministries.

Q: So there has to come to you an order from a higher authority?

A: Regarding the situation of the Kurdistan Workers Party, this is an issue of sovereignty. This is connected with the Iraqi state as a state in cooperation with the Turkish state or what is present between the states.

Q: When will the people- the IDPs- of Sinjar return, in particular the Yezidi brothers? And who is not allowing them to return? Be honest with me.

A: I will be honest with you, but more frank on this point. With regards to the Yezidi brothers, they have a special situation. And today, 150,000 Yezidis are outside of Iraq because of what happened in the previous years. After the liberation, there came upon us lean years- I use this expression: there came upon us lean years. The Iraqi government and the Kurdistan Regional Government neglected the area. I do not know the reasons. It was not within their priorities. The citizens- the Yezidi brothers- there are those of them who have returned, and there are reasons for the lack of return. You know, today I am in this area since such-and-such years, dozens or hundreds of years. I have lost my maternal uncle and paternal uncle and my family, or perhaps three or four from a family, or maybe out of an extended family of 40, and there remain three or four, what is the possibility of my returning here and being able to live? I don’t have the possibility.

Q: After the entry and seizure of control by the Iraqi government, what prevents them from returning? The problem is I see the army, I see the security forces, the Hashd Sha’abi, I see the federal police. After all of these security forces, the Yezidis are afraid to return to Sinjar. The reason?

A: Reasons, not one reason.

Q: The reasons.

A: I have just told you one of the reasons.

Q: The forces present in Sinjar are the reason?

A: No, no, no, no. Sorry. The reasons are internal.

Q: Tell me of the Yezidis, what about them?

A: The Yezidi brothers, those who say they are not returning, this is contrary to the reality. The Yezidis are present in Sinjar.

Q: Fine, but in Duhok, there are the camps.

A: Not only as regards Sinjar, come let me tell you of other areas, outside of Sinjar, from where there has been displacement. How many of the people have not returned to them! Not only Sinjar. In all of Iraq there have been IDPs.

Q: So it is not a security issue.

A: All the IDPs who have left their areas. Come and see in the provinces that have been victims of Da’esh, not all the people have returned.

Q: But Sinjar with its particular situation…

A: Its particular situation: there are people are of different types: let me sort them for you. There are people who have left Sinjar, a large number I told you of, who have gone outside of Iraq. They cannot live in Iraq because of the losses they suffered because of Da’esh. Second, of them there are those who have joined other societies: six years, not small. They have a profession, they have work, they have gone in this direction. The lack of political stability present in the area during six years; of course people also who say I return again and the same political problems? As for security problems, we don’t have a security problem such that people do not return. The matter of return requires time.


MESOPOTAMIA NEWS : The US & Israel Prepare for Iranian Revenge

By Lt. Col. (res.) Dr. Mordechai KedarJanuary 1, 2021 – ISRAEL – BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,863, January 1, 2021

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Moments before Donald Trump leaves the White House, Iran may try to avenge the killing of Qassem Soleimani and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh. The Gulf States are prepared, and they expect American protection.

On January 20, 2021, President Donald Trump is slated to exit the scene and perhaps even the stage of history—but Iran remains. Its leaders took hard hits from Trump during his tenure, but worst of all is the way he humiliated them in the eyes of the world. The ayatollahs held on despite everything Trump threw at them, but their honor was trampled. For that there is no forgiving or forgetting.

weiterlesen / click to continue

« neuere Artikel / next articles   ältere Artikel / previous articles »