MESOP NEWS : Give War a Chance – Turkish Leader Finesses Political Defeat
By Burak Bekdil July 30, 2021 – BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 2,109, July 30, 2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Turks are hungry for fairy tales. Any feel-good news propaganda—including Erdoğan’s “The West, including the Germans, are jealous of us!” tirade—finds millions of receptive listeners in Turkey’s postmodern marketplace of absurdity.
MESOP NEWS : Shanghai Cooperation Council (China-Russia) Declares Bloc Will Fight Terrorism In Afghanistan To Fill Vacuum After US Departure
by Tsarizm Staff July 28, 2021
Moscow And Beijing Worried About Islamic Radicalism Now That World’s Policeman Is Gone
The Shanghai Cooperation Council is a geopolitical bloc meant to counter Western and especially U.S. hegemony in world power. Essentially, it is Russia and China, and client states.
MESOP NEWS : Shanghai Cooperation Council (China-Russland) erklärt, dass der Block den Terrorismus in Afghanistan bekämpfen wird, um das Vakuum nach dem Abzug der USA zu füllen
von Tsarizm StaffJ uli 28, 2021
Der Shanghai Cooperation Council ist ein geopolitischer Block, der der westlichen und insbesondere der US-Hegemonie in der Weltmacht entgegenwirken soll. Im Wesentlichen sind es Russland und China und die Kundenstaaten. Es sieht so aus, als ob dieser Block jetzt über den islamischen Radikalismus in Zentralasien besorgt ist, da die Vereinigten Staaten Kräfte abziehen. Der islamische Fundamentalismus ist ein Problem in Russland und in China. Die KPCh hält derzeit über 1M Uiguren in Konzentrationslagern fest, im Wesentlichen Umerziehungseinrichtungen.
Die Verteidigungsminister der Mitgliedstaaten der Shanghaier Organisation für Zusammenarbeit (SOZ) betonen die Notwendigkeit, den wachsenden Aktivitäten von Terroristen nach dem Abzug ausländischer Militärkontingente aus Afghanistan entgegenzuwirken, sagten die SOZ-Verteidigungschefs in einer gemeinsamen Erklärung nach ihrem Treffen in Duschanbe am Mittwoch, berichtete die staatliche russische Nachrichtenagentur TASS.
Die Verteidigungschefs der SOZ “stellten fest, dass die Situation im SOZ-Raum nicht destabilisiert wird und die Aktivitäten terroristischer Gruppen in der Region nach dem Abzug der Militärkontingente der NATO und anderer Länder aus Afghanistan erheblich zunehmen”, heißt es in dem Dokument.
Das SOZ-Treffen genehmigte auch einen Plan der Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Verteidigungsministerien des Blocks für 2022-2023, “um die Freundschaft und die gutnachbarschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den SOZ-Mitgliedstaaten zu stärken, Frieden, Sicherheit und Stabilität in der Region zu wahren, sprachen die Verteidigungschefs für den Aufbau einer praktischen Interaktion der SOZ mit regionalen Partnerorganisationen”, heißt es in der gemeinsamen Erklärung.
MESOP NEWS : EISKREM BEN & JERRYS, ANNETTA KAHANE & DIE STASI DER DDR
Deutsche NGO verurteilt Ben & Jerrys wegen Boykotts von Judäa + Samaria
Die Amadeu Antonio Stiftung beendet ihre Partnerschaft mit dem Eiscremehersteller und sagt, ihr Boykott fördere Antisemitismus.
MESOP NEWS: DIE NEUEN ÜBERWACHER SIND DIE ALTEN
„Ein Ex-Stasi-Spitzel namens Annetta Kahane (alias IM Victoria) Sie schwärzte 1976 die beiden ältesten Schriftsteller Brasch-Söhne bei der Stasi an: “Zu den Feinden der DDR gehören in erster Linie Klaus Brasch[wp] und Thomas Brasch[wp].”)“
Wikimania
MESOP NEWS : EX-MOSSAD CHEF – Die USA werden dem Iran erlauben, Atomwaffen zu erwerben
Danny Yatom, ehemaliger Mossad-Chef, warnt, dass Israel einen Backup-Plan brauche, “falls das Schlimmste passiert”.
- August 2021 – Der frühere Mossad-Chef Danny Yatom glaubt, dass die Biden-Regierung es dem Iran ermöglichen wird, innerhalb kurzer Zeit die Technologie und die operativen Fähigkeiten zu erlangen, um eine Atombombe herzustellen .
MESOP NEWS : TÜRKEI & IRAN & BAGHDAD GEGEN PKK
Bruderzwist im Nordirak: Kurdische Parteien bekämpfen sich
30 Juli 2021 RUSSIA TODAY REPORT – Die Lage in der autonomen Region Kurdistan im Norden Iraks ist angespannt, nachdem in den vergangenen Wochen immer wieder Konflikte zwischen den Kämpfern der KPD und der PKK eskaliert sind. Die Auseinandersetzungen forderten beiderseits bereits mehrere Todesopfer.
MESOP NEWS : lingua tertii, quatri oder quinti imperii (KLEMPERER) / Stammeln unter der Pride Flag
Sie gendern, um zu herrschen
Der Grund für die Propagierung von Gendersprache ist nicht die Beförderung der Gleichberechtigung sondern die Verfestigung von Herrschaft mit Hilfe der Sprache.
Von Friedrich Lang. Achgut achse
Jedermann weiß, dass die sogenannte Gendersprache aus linguistischer und soziologischer Sicht unsinnig und nicht praktikabel ist. Sogar deren Befürworter.
MESOP GENERAL OVERVIEW STATISTIC – Middle East economic outlook hinges on vaccinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
MESOP NEWS : Wird sich Erdogans afghanischer Schachzug in Washington auszahlen?
Der allgemeine Eindruck ist, dass Ankaras Engagement für den Schutz des Flughafens Kabul nur darauf abzielt, die Gunst Washingtons zu gewinnen.
Semih Idiz Juli 30, 2021 AL MONITOR – Viele Türken sind zutiefst besorgt über die Bereitschaft von Präsident Recep Tayyip Erdogan, türkische Streitkräfte nach dem Abzug der US-Streitkräfte aus diesem Land zur Sicherheit am Flughafen von Kabul einzusetzen – trotz der inhärenten Gefahren einer solchen Mission.
Die Frage wird auch mit der frage nach dem dramatischen Anstieg der Zahl der afghanischen Flüchtlinge vermischt, die derzeit in die Türkei reisen, nachdem US-Präsident Joe Biden beschlossen hat, die US-Streitkräfte aus Afghanistan abzuziehen.
Das Thema verursacht eine zunehmend hässliche politische innenpolitische Debatte zwischen der Erdogan-Regierung und der Opposition und schürt auch rassistische Gefühle unter Türken gegen Araber und Afghanen.
Für die meisten erfahrenen türkischen Diplomaten ist Erdogans Bereitschaft, die Aufgabe des Schutzes des Flughafens von Kabul zu übernehmen, einfach eines seiner schlecht durchdachten Projekte.
“Zunächst einmal weiß niemand genau, ob dies Ankaras Angebot oder Washingtons Vorschlag war”, schrieb der pensionierte Botschafter Ali Tuygan in seinem Blog Diplomatic Opinion.
“Aber der allgemeine Eindruck ist, dass dies ein Angebot der türkischen Regierung war, Washington zu einer verständnisvolleren Haltung gegenüber türkisch-amerikanischen Differenzen zu bringen, indem sie türkische Truppen in Gefahr brachte”, fuhr er fort.
Turkish-American ties have been clouded for quite some time with multiple issues, including the question of Ankara’s purchase of Russian-made S-400 anti-missile defense systems that has resulted in US sanctions and other punitive measures being slapped on Turkey.
This has also contributed significantly to the serious downturn of the Turkish economy, as a result of which Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party are said to be losing domestic credibility.
The expectation in government circles appears to be that any improvement in Turkish-US ties will also help the Turkish economy, thus shoring up Erdogan’s domestic support.
Ankara has also been seeking means to improve ties with Israel in order to facilitate better ties with Washington.
Retired Ambassador Suha Umar believes that Erdogan’s decision to take on the security of Kabul airport is a sign of desperation.
“This is an act that is based more on necessity than anything else,” he told Al Monitor, pointing at Turkey’s economic crisis as well as Ankara’s weakened hand on the international stage.
“For a country in this situation to undertake such a mission that is fraught with uncertainty — and which will require resources in every respect — does not appear sensible,” Umar said. “All that is left is a situation that reflects desperation.”
Few believe that Turkey’s involvement in Afghanistan after the departure of US forces will provide any benefits for Ankara. Many recall that Turkey’s involvement in Syria and Libya also fell short of achieving their ultimate objectives.
The end result, it is feared, will be that Turkish forces will be placed at risk while Erdogan’s adventurism drags the country into a quagmire.
“Would this put Turkish troops in harm’s way? Yes, definitely. Because the Taliban does not have to take over Kabul to disrupt the functioning of the airport, it has many other means at its disposal,” Tuygan wrote.
Meanwhile, Erdogan’s approach to the whole question also appears to be deeply confused and riddled with contradictions.
Erdogan is trying to reach out to the Taliban, on the one hand, by using Islamic rhetoric and castigating “imperial powers” that he accuses of having meddled in that country for decades.
On the other hand, he is calling on the principal target of his anti-imperial rhetoric, namely the United States, to provide financial and logistical support for the Turkish military mission at Kabul airport.
How he expects the Taliban not to see through this glaring contradiction is anyone’s guess.
The Taliban clearly sees Turkish forces in Afghanistan as an extension of the US-led NATO mission in that country and has already used threatening language in calling on Turkey to also withdraw its troops.
Erdogan, nevertheless, appears to be relying on Sunni Islam as the lowest common denominator that will facilitate talks between Ankara and the Taliban.
“Turkey and the Taliban should be able to conduct these talks easily since there is nothing out of keeping with Turkey’s beliefs and their beliefs,” Erdogan told reporters recently during a visit to northern Cyprus.
Not surprisingly, these remarks created uproar among secular Turks who are castigating Erdogan for placing Turkey and the Taliban in the same category.
Even some of Erdogan’s staunchest supporters like Hurriyet columnist Ahmet Hakan have rejected the notion of any equivalence between the practice of Islam in Turkey and the radical Islamic outlook of the Taliban.
Hakan nevertheless argued that Turkey’s Islamic character could facilitate a dialogue with the Taliban.
In criticizing Erdogan’s remark, liberal commentator Taha Akyol, however, stressed Turkey’s democratic and secular character as a social state based on the rule of law.
“Are we not going to remain [in Afghanistan] under NATO’s umbrella?” Akyol also asked in his column for Karar daily. “It is wrong to look at the matter from the perspective of faith and to think that there is nothing out of keeping [between Turkey and the outlook of the] Taliban.”
Erdogan’s notion that Islam will bring Turkey and the Arab world closer also turned out to be a fallacy. This is clearly evident in the minimal support Ankara is getting from the Arab world over its involvements in Syria and Libya.
Umar pointed out that Ankara may be expecting the decision to take on the security of Kabul airport to improve ties with Washington, but stressed that the conditions for securing such an improvement are very different.
“If it could fulfill these conditions there would be no need for Turkey to take on any extra risks,” he said. He noted that taking on such extra risks is unlikely to improve ties with the United States.
Trying to appease the Taliban by claiming that Turkey and the Taliban share similar outlooks with regard to faith is also likely to stoke American suspicions regarding Turkish intentions.
“Was das für den Westen bedeutet, ist folgendes: ‘Wir teilen die gleiche Sichtweise wie eure Feinde.’ Es ist sehr schwer zu verstehen, welche Art von Argumentation oder Politik dies darstellt”, sagte Umar.
“Man muss die Zuverlässigkeit eines Verehrten in Frage stellen, der letzte Woche zugegeben hat, dass die Türkei ‘keine widersprüchlichen Probleme mit [den] Überzeugungen [der Taliban] hat'”, schrieb Aykan Erdemir von der Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
“Diese Kommentare sollten als rote Fahnen inmitten der laufenden Verhandlungen zwischen Ankara und Washington über Erdogans Angebot dienen, türkische Truppen zur Bewachung des internationalen Flughafens von Kabul nach dem Abzug der USA einzusetzen”, fuhr Erdemir in einem Meinungsbeitrag für Newsweek fort.
Mit so vielen offenen Fragen, die unbeantwortet bleiben, wird die innenpolitische Debatte in der Türkei – gespickt mit viel Wut und Schuldzuweisungen – in den kommenden Tagen nur noch wachsen und könnte Erdogan viel weniger in der Hand lassen, als er mit seinem afghanischen Schachzug erwartet hatte.
MESOP NEWS : Will Erdogan’s Afghan gambit pay off in Washington?
The general impression is that Ankara’s commitment to protect Kabul airport is only aimed at winning favor with Washington.Semih Idiz – AL MONITOR – July 30, 2021 Many Turks are deeply concerned over President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s readiness to commit Turkish forces to provide the security at Kabul airport — despite the inherent dangers of such a mission — following the departure of US forces from that country. The question is also being conflated with that of the dramatic increase in the number of Afghan refugees currently heading for Turkey, in the wake of US President Joe Biden’s decision to pull US forces out of Afghanistan. The issue is causing an increasingly ugly political domestic debate between the Erdogan administration and the opposition, and also stoking racist sentiments among Turks against Arabs and Afghans. To most seasoned Turkish diplomats, Erdogan’s willingness to take on the task of protecting Kabul airport is simply another one of his ill-conceived projects. “To start with, nobody knows for sure whether this was Ankara’s offer or Washington’s suggestion,” wrote retired Ambassador Ali Tuygan in his Diplomatic Opinion blog. “But the general impression is that this was an offer by the Turkish government to cajole Washington into a more understanding attitude on Turkish-American differences by putting Turkish troops in harm’s way,” he continued. Turkish-American ties have been clouded for quite some time with multiple issues, including the question of Ankara’s purchase of Russian-made S-400 anti-missile defense systems that has resulted in US sanctions and other punitive measures being slapped on Turkey. This has also contributed significantly to the serious downturn of the Turkish economy, as a result of which Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party are said to be losing domestic credibility. The expectation in government circles appears to be that any improvement in Turkish-US ties will also help the Turkish economy, thus shoring up Erdogan’s domestic support. Ankara has also been seeking means to improve ties with Israel in order to facilitate better ties with Washington. Retired Ambassador Suha Umar believes that Erdogan’s decision to take on the security of Kabul airport is a sign of desperation. “This is an act that is based more on necessity than anything else,” he told Al Monitor, pointing at Turkey’s economic crisis as well as Ankara’s weakened hand on the international stage. “For a country in this situation to undertake such a mission that is fraught with uncertainty — and which will require resources in every respect — does not appear sensible,” Umar said. “All that is left is a situation that reflects desperation.” Few believe that Turkey’s involvement in Afghanistan after the departure of US forces will provide any benefits for Ankara. Many recall that Turkey’s involvement in Syria and Libya also fell short of achieving their ultimate objectives. The end result, it is feared, will be that Turkish forces will be placed at risk while Erdogan’s adventurism drags the country into a quagmire. “Would this put Turkish troops in harm’s way? Yes, definitely. Because the Taliban does not have to take over Kabul to disrupt the functioning of the airport, it has many other means at its disposal,” Tuygan wrote. Meanwhile, Erdogan’s approach to the whole question also appears to be deeply confused and riddled with contradictions. Erdogan is trying to reach out to the Taliban, on the one hand, by using Islamic rhetoric and castigating “imperial powers” that he accuses of having meddled in that country for decades. On the other hand, he is calling on the principal target of his anti-imperial rhetoric, namely the United States, to provide financial and logistical support for the Turkish military mission at Kabul airport. How he expects the Taliban not to see through this glaring contradiction is anyone’s guess. The Taliban clearly sees Turkish forces in Afghanistan as an extension of the US-led NATO mission in that country and has already used threatening language in calling on Turkey to also withdraw its troops. Erdogan, nevertheless, appears to be relying on Sunni Islam as the lowest common denominator that will facilitate talks between Ankara and the Taliban. “Turkey and the Taliban should be able to conduct these talks easily since there is nothing out of keeping with Turkey’s beliefs and their beliefs,” Erdogan told reporters recently during a visit to northern Cyprus. Not surprisingly, these remarks created uproar among secular Turks who are castigating Erdogan for placing Turkey and the Taliban in the same category. Even some of Erdogan’s staunchest supporters like Hurriyet columnist Ahmet Hakan have rejected the notion of any equivalence between the practice of Islam in Turkey and the radical Islamic outlook of the Taliban. Hakan nevertheless argued that Turkey’s Islamic character could facilitate a dialogue with the Taliban. In criticizing Erdogan’s remark, liberal commentator Taha Akyol, however, stressed Turkey’s democratic and secular character as a social state based on the rule of law. “Are we not going to remain [in Afghanistan] under NATO’s umbrella?” Akyol also asked in his column for Karar daily. “It is wrong to look at the matter from the perspective of faith and to think that there is nothing out of keeping [between Turkey and the outlook of the] Taliban.” Erdogan’s notion that Islam will bring Turkey and the Arab world closer also turned out to be a fallacy. This is clearly evident in the minimal support Ankara is getting from the Arab world over its involvements in Syria and Libya. Umar pointed out that Ankara may be expecting the decision to take on the security of Kabul airport to improve ties with Washington, but stressed that the conditions for securing such an improvement are very different. “If it could fulfill these conditions there would be no need for Turkey to take on any extra risks,” he said. He noted that taking on such extra risks is unlikely to improve ties with the United States. Trying to appease the Taliban by claiming that Turkey and the Taliban share similar outlooks with regard to faith is also likely to stoke American suspicions regarding Turkish intentions. “What this translates into as far as the West is concerned is this: ‘We share the same outlook as your enemies.’ It is very difficult to understand what kind of reasoning or policy this represents,” said Umar. “One has to question the reliability of an ally who admitted last week that Turkey ‘does not have any conflicting issues with [the Taliban’s] beliefs,’ wrote Aykan Erdemir from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “These comments ought to serve as red flags amid ongoing negotiations between Ankara and Washington over Erdogan’s offer to deploy Turkish troops to guard Kabul’s international airport after US departure,” Erdemir continued in an opinion piece for Newsweek. With so many outstanding questions that remain unanswered, the domestic debate in Turkey —laced with much anger and recriminations — will only grow in the coming days and could leave Erdogan with much less in hand than he expected to gain with his Afghan gambit. Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/07/will-erdogans-afghan-gambit-pay-washington#ixzz72CCTLOo8 |
« neuere Artikel / next articles ältere Artikel / previous articles »