MESOP MIDEAST WATCH: Qassas warns against “reconciliations”, describes them as traps

 The head of the Modernity and Democracy Party for Syria, Firas Qassas, considered that the so-called “settlements” carried out by the Damascus government are nothing but traps, warning that their goal is to restore Syria before 2011.17 Jan 2022, Mon  – ANF NEwS ( PRO PKK SOURCE)

–  The Damascus government is promoting so-called “settlements” or “reconciliations” in some areas, with the aim of extending its control over them. However, daily practical experience has proven that these “settlements” did not contribute to achieving security and stability in these areas.

The Damascus government repeated the scenario of “reconciliations” and reworked it again in north and east Syria in general and the city of Raqqa in particular, which was met with popular rejection by the sons, sheikhs and dignitaries of the Arab clans in Raqqa and its countryside.

In this regard, the head of the Modernity and Democracy Party for Syria, Firas Qassas, told our agency: “Settlements certainly hinder the solution of the Syrian crisis, because they give the regime additional weights that prevent it from proceeding with a political solution and increase the area of ​​the circle of illusion that it does not want to  exit from.”

He added, “The Syrian regime’s delusion that it has won and that it can turn back the clock to dedicate Assadism again, intensifying catastrophic values ​​and monopolizing the fate and capabilities of the country, and violating the will of its people.

He added, “Therefore, these “mines” reconciliations must be rejected, in order to continue to provide prerequisites and factors for a solution in Syria, and to persevere in proceeding with the project of democratic Autonomous Administration supporting it and contributing to its criticism and correction until it achieves its full value ceilings and philosophical bets that solve the dilemma of political society.  In the areas of the Autonomous Administration only, but also in all of Syria, and perhaps in its entire geostrategic surroundings.

‘There is no guarantee that the regime provides to anyone’

When asked about the fate of those making reconciliations, al-Qassas said: “There is no guarantee that the regime offers to anyone and we can rely on it. We have experiences of assassination and liquidation for those who fell into the traps of its “reconciliation” and believed it.”

Al-Qassas continued, “He arrested many, tortured many, and killed many without batting an eyelid. A regime that believes in power and dominance, and does not care about people’s lives, but rather destroys and despises them whenever it sees the necessity of that for the continuation of its authority.”

Al-Qassas wondered, “How can a regime like this fulfill what it promises, who says it is reconciling them? It simply nullifies their effectiveness. It seizes their spheres of influence and breaks the cohesion of their positions, and then no sooner erases their presence or marginalizes it and whistles it at best. No one can trust the system and bet on it.”  And then he wins, that’s totally impossible.”

Al-Qassas explained, “What the regime is doing in the region in reality is nothing but an attempt to return the situation there to what was before 2011. It is not possible objectively and semantically to use the term reconciliations on the regime’s endeavor in this context.  Equal in relation to the value of the right and the distance from it, they fell into a problematic struggle or strife, as the language of heritage likes to describe.

Al-Qassas continued, “This is not true at all, contradicts the truth and contradicts it. The party of the regime is a repressive dictatorship, immersed in its tyranny and tyranny;  organized and ignited a revolution against an authority whose dominance buildings competed with the buildings of the state, a people who revolted for their dignity and freedom, and it is in its narrowest sense.”

Al-Qassas believes that “the second semantic approach to reconciliation means a settlement based on an equal outcome between the two parties, not restoring the regime’s hegemony and full authority over the region, as happened in previous regions, in many Syrian regions.  strictness and utter inconsistency.

In conclusion, Al-Qassas said, “Certainly the regime will repeat the scenario of Daraa and change it. Its goal is one and clear, and it is not important to it that there is a difference in relation to the militants or not. It only cares about restoring its control over the fate of the country and the people and returning those who revolted against his tyranny to Al-Assad’s farm in the worst forms.”  its interaction with public life in Syria.