| “The fourth time [Biden] has endorsed strategic clarity. This is now US policy, despite his administration’s attempt (also for the fourth time) to walk it back. Now time to fully resource this commitment and truly focus on it,” CFR’s David Sacks tweets.
“Smart people may differ about the wisdom of eroding strategic ambiguity around Taiwan, but with stakes this high, the public deserves a clear and open discussion of the high risks and cost and benefits of defending the island,” Foreign Policy’s Howard W. French writes.
This Backgrounder explains U.S. policy toward Taiwan. |